Saturday, February 23, 2008

United States-Mexico Barrier




The nearly 2000 miles international border between Mexico and the United States runs through four states—California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas, with the west end--San Diego, California and the east end—Brownsville, Texas. Texas has the longest stretch of the border of any State, while California has the shortest. The region along the boundary is characterized by deserts, rugged mountains, urban cities, and two major rivers—the Colorado and the Rio Grand.

On October 26, 2006, with the stroke of a pen, President Bush signed the Secure Fence Act, authorizing the construction of 700 miles additional fencing along the Southern border. According to President’s announcement, it is an important step forward in the nation’s efforts to control the borders and reform the immigration system. One of Bush’s most encouraging words is “We're a nation of laws, and we must enforce our laws. We're also a nation of immigrants, and we must uphold that tradition, which has strengthened our country in so many ways.”

With the hope of strengthening safety of the border and controlling illegal immigration, the Secure Fence Act has caused a wide debate.

The proponents of the bill believe that the bill will benefit the United States in a lot of ways. They point out that most American citizens currently want less immigration, not more. The legal immigration is already too high. The border enforcement will be effective in controlling illegal immigration, and as a result, be helpful in controlling the whole immigration. They also emphasize that the United States should be careful who they let in on a temporary basis, and build a national database of employment so that every native or foreign employee can be tracked down. On the way towards this aim, the pass of the bill is an important step. Moreover, supporters of the bill take the barriers as an important way of tapering the transportation of illegal drugs manufactured in Latin America.

However, the proponents of open-border policies hold different ideas. They believe some of the illegal immigrants have been providing considerable contributions to the development of the United States. For example, agricultural work is one of the many types of work that illegal immigrants fill and could not be easily filled by United States citizens. Laredo’s Mayor, Raul G. Salinas says the illegal immigrants are “that are sustaining our economy by forty percent, and I am gonna close the door on them and put a wall? You don’t do that. It’s like a slap in the face.”

In addition, some experts on immigration polices point out that the efforts to curtail illegal immigration by means of border fence has done nothing but redirect the migration flows into the most desolate and desert areas of the border, thus increasing the mortality rate of illegal immigrants. Moreover, while failing in inhibiting illegal immigration, the fence prevents the migrants from returning.

Finally, there is also opposite voice from the neighbor country—Mexico that has complained the expanded fences along their shared border would damage the environment and hard wildlife.

Billions of dollars have been spent out in the border enforcement program. Some believe we actually haven’t solved the problem and there is no need to stay the course that is not working, while others think the pass of the bill is a vital step forward in the immigration reforming program. The debate on the issue of border fence is ongoing and may never stop. The government’s policy on this issue keeps changing periodically depending on both the result of the debate and the real national and international conditions.

Source URL:
United Sates-Mexico Border

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Clashes between Species: Humans and Non-human Animals











Settlement buildings, business, and mining firms have been expanding into some national parks and important wild habitats where the indigenous wild animals are forced to live with their new neighbors—human beings. During these processes, the number and characteristics of the wild animals change to the extent that is out of humans’ imaginations

The native residents in South Africa are annoyed and confused by the local elephants’ increasingly aggressive behaviors. In contrast, Yellowstone’s visitors were stunned by the tameness of the blood carnivore grizzly bear who gathered at garbage piles near park hotels to gorge on leftovers and begged for handouts on the park roads between the late of 1800s and the early 1900s. Moreover, in the tropic rainforest regions such as Peru, people are bewildered—why the malaria can not be rooted out no matter what medicines, insecticides, or mosquito nets are used.

To uncover these riddles, humans should fix their eyes on the changes of the non-human animals’ habitats that have been caused by human beings. For instance, the shrink of elephants’ habitats force gentle elephants to become aggressive in order to gain and keep their territories. Humans’ living waste in grizzly bear habitats reduced bears into beggars that lost hunting skills and failed to live wildly in the early 1990s. When it comes to figure out why the mosquitoes are so formidable in Amazon region, flooding settlers and deforests are the answers. In what was untouched rain forest, new settlers farm fish and cut wood for charcoal. As trees fall, sunlight warms ponds and puddles, transforming them into mosquito breeding grounds.

Human beings explore non-human animals’ habitats at the price of the broken ecological balance, climate changes and diseases. Fortunately, humans are not blind any more. They have recognized the price, tried to lower it and looked for ways that can benefit both of humans and non-human animals by kinds of environment conservation activities.

Shrink of Elephants’ Habitats
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mag/2006/06/25/stories/2006062500080100.htm
Raging Malaria